Need pdf viewer for iPad? Visit iTunes for: iAnnotate PDF
Garland's Digest on employment discrimination law online since 1997
TREATISE INDEX "P" Pancreatitis Panic disorder or attacks Paramour Partner Pattern or practice discrimination Pennsylvania Pension trust fund Permanent resident Personal staff exception Phobias Physical exertion Piggybacking rule (regarding administrative charges) Police officer Policymaking government official exception to Title VII Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Postal Service Preemption of employment discrimination laws Pregnancy discrimination Pretext Prima facie case Procreation / Reproduction Promotion Prostate cancer Protected activity Protected class Psoriasis Psychotherapist-patient privilege Puerto Rico Punitive damages Pancreatitis Pancreatitis (cases addressing particular medical impairments) - 13.251.22 [TOP] Panic disorder or attacks Panic disorder or attacks (cases addressing particular medical impairments) - 13.251.23 [TOP] Paramour Favoritism to paramour, family member or others is not evidence of a pretext for discrimination - 4.750.10 Termination due to status as paramour - 4.750.11 [TOP] Partner Whether a partner is an employee - 1.400 [TOP] Pattern or practice discrimination ADA, statutory authority for pattern or practice suits - 5.321 Claims brought by government - 5.332 Class actions - 5.331 Definition/method of proof - 5.310 Individual claims - 5.333 [TOP] Pennsylvania Interaction between federal employment discrimination law and Pennsylvania state law - 23.040 [TOP] Pension trust fund Whether a pension trust fund can be sued - 2.905 [TOP] Permanent resident Whether Title VII protects a lawful permanent resident working overseas - 1.908.20 [TOP] Personal staff exception Personal staff exception to Title VII - 1.600 Personal staff exemption - 18.551 [TOP] Phobias Phobia about driving in unfamiliar places (cases addressing particular impairments) - 13.251.24 [TOP] Physical exertion Physical exertion as a major life activity - 13.223.18 [TOP] Piggybacking rule (regarding administrative charges) Single filing (or piggybacking) rule - 6.314 ADEA actions - 6.314.10 Person who has previously filed a charge may not try to piggyback onto someone else's EEOC charge - 6.314.30 Person who timely filed charge must file lawsuit - 6.314.20 [TOP] Police officer Whether the position of police officer is a "broad range of jobs" or a "class of jobs" for purposes of determining whether someone is disabled with respect to the major life activity of working - 13.225.32.22 [TOP] Policymaking government official exception to Title VII Policymaking government official exception to Title VII - 1.600 [TOP] Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (cases addressing particular impairments) - 13.251.25 [TOP] Postal Service See, United States Postal Service (this index) [TOP] Preemption of employment discrimination laws Aviation and Transportation Security Act (Homeland Security) - 24.121 Foreign Service employees and mandatory retirement - 24.124 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act - 9.333 Foreign treaties allowing discrimination - 24.130 Railway Labor Act - 24.122 Security clearances - 24.123 State secrets doctrine - 24.125 Title VII does not preempt a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action - 24.210 [TOP] Pregnancy discrimination For generic Title VII issues See, "Title VII" (this index) Employer's knowledge of pregnancy - 18.332 Pregnancy (disability cases addressing particular medical impairments) - 13.251.27.20 Pregnancy discrimination claims analyzed the same way as other claims - 18.331 Prima facie case, generic pregnancy prima facie case - 4.522 Title VII statute prohibiting pregnancy discrimination - 18.114 [TOP] Pretext Adverse action because employer does not like employee - 4.748.10 Adverse action due to employee's disparaging remarks or lack of respect for employer's authority - 4.748.20 Affirmative action efforts - 4.803 Application of Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. - 4.711 Reduction in force cases - 4.711.10 Circumstances of adverse action are suspicious Close temporal proximity less probative where employer was merely waiting until employee on leave returned to work before taking action - 4.743.80 Failure to follow company rules or policies - 4.743.40 Failure to promulgate hiring and promotion policies - 4.743.50 Interview issues Failure to ask all applicants the same questions - 4.743.21 Interviewer's notes or recollection - 4.743.22 Lack of company documents - 4.743.10 Pre-selection of another candidate - 4.743.60 Request for release - 4.743.90 Sudden employer dissatisfaction - 4.743.70 Treatment of pregnant employee Failure to congratulate pregnant employee - 4.743.31 Failure to inquire as to how to accommodate pregnant employee and soon-to-be new parent - 4.743.32 Definition of pretext - 4.730 Employer's honest belief - 4.731 Discretion in selecting a management level employee - 4.746.10 Disparate treatment as evidence of pretext Definition of similarly situated - 4.744.20 Plaintiff has burden of proving similarly situated - 4.744.21 Whether employees are similarly situated is a fact question - 4.744.22 Disparate discipline - 4.744.10 Knowledge of decisionmaker - 4.744.11 Employee's failure to pass examination excused by futile gesture doctrine? - 4.745.41 Employer's disciplinary practices may change over time, which is not evidence of pretext - 4.744.80 Full-time vs. part-time employees - 4.744.40 Plaintiff cannot ignore similarly situated non-protected employees who were not treated more favorably - 4.744.70 Probationary vs. non-probationary employees - 4.744.30 Supervisor vs. lower-ranked employee - 4.744.50 Disparity in qualifications or performance - 4.745 Employee's or co-worker's opinion of employee's qualifications or performance - 4.745.10 Educational level - 4.745.20 Evaluations Applicability of "cat's paw" or "rubber stamp" exception - 4.745.31 Employer's decision not to rely on evaluations in making an employment decision - 4.745.34 Employer's reliance on more recent performance - 4.745.33 Prior evaluations - 4.745.32 EEOC findings sufficient to create jury question? - 4.748.30 Employer has right to change employee's duties - 4.748.20 Employer's business judgment - 4.712 Evidence of discrimination or pretext may be sufficient to make out a jury question - 4.710 Favoritism to paramour, family member or others is not evidence of a pretext for discrimination - 4.750.10 Jury question: Pretext determination normally jury question - 4.722 Level of proof necessary to establish pretext or jury question - 4.720 Multiple reasons: If employer gives multiple reasons, must employee establish pretext as to all reasons? - 4.721 Pretext, alone, is sufficient to create jury question - 4.711.20 Pretext determined based on facts as they appeared to decisionmaker - 4.723 Pretext, alone, may not create jury question - 4.750 Proffered reason is suspicious Failure to give reason - 4.742.50 Inconsistent or changing proffered reasons - 4.742.10 Post-hoc or belated identification of reason for adverse employment action - 4.742.20 Critical memos prepared after the fact may support finding of pretext - 4.742.21 Later elaboration on reasons for adverse employment action - 4.742.22 Proffered reason is insufficient motivation - 4.742.30 "Insufficient to motivate" is same as "lack of honest belief" - 4.742.31 Proffered reason is wrong, unwise or unfair - 4.742.40 Proffered reason is reckless or not reasonably informed - 4.742.41 Reduction in force Pretext in a RIF case - 4.747 RIF where employer is hiring younger employees for other positions - 4.747.10 RIF where recent hires are not considered for the RIF - 4.747.20 Satisfactory performance may not be evidence of pretext in a RIF - 4.747.30 Statistical evidence, use of to establish pretext - 4.748.30 Racial composition of workforce - 4.748.31 Subjective reasons, employer's reliance on - 4.746 Types of circumstantial evidence - 4.741 [TOP] Prima facie case ADEA prima facie case, generic - 4.521 Adverse employment action prong (see "Adverse employment action" this index) Consideration of prima facie case after trial on merits - 4.430 Constructive discharge prima facie case - 4.534.10 Demotion prima facie case - 4.532.40 Denial of tenure prima facie case - 4.532.30 Denial of training prima facie case - 4.533.20 Discipline (wrongful) prima facie case - 4.533.40 Failure to hire prima facie case - 4.531.10 ADEA failure to hire prima facie case - 4.531.11 Failure to promote prima facie case - 4.532.10 Failure to transfer prima facie case - 4.532.20 Flexibility of prima facie case - 4.512 Generic prima facie case - 4.520 Member of protected class prong (see "Protected class" this index) Pregnancy prima facie case, generic - 4.522 Proof necessary to establish prima facie case - 4.511 Purpose of prima facie case - 4.510 Qualified for position prong (see "Qualified for position prong" this index) Race prima facie case, generic - 4.523 Reduction in force prima facie case - 4.534.20 Mini-RIF prima facie case - 4.534.21 Religious prima facie case, generic - 4.524 Sex prima facie case, generic - 4.525 "Similarly situated," burden of establishing at prima facie case verses pretext stage - 4.513 Suspension (wrongful) prima facie case - 4.533.30 Termination (wrongful) prima facie case - 4.534.30 Unequal pay prima facie case under Title VII - 4.533.10 Unequal treatment, generic prima facie case - 4.533.50 [TOP] Procreation / Reproduction Reproductive function as a major life activity - 13.223.02.11 Procreation / Reproduction (disabled with respect to) - 13.225.21 [TOP] Promotion See, "Failure to promote" (this index) [TOP] Prostate cancer Prostate cancer (cases addressing particular medical impairments) - 13.251.10.10 [TOP] Protected activity See, "Retaliation" (this index) [TOP] Protected class ADEA claims - 4.542 Advocate on behalf of members of protected class is entitled to sue - 1.901 Reverse discrimination prima facie case - 4.541 [TOP] Psoriasis Psoriasis (cases addressing particular medical impairments) - 13.251.26 [TOP] Psychotherapist-patient privilege Psychotherapist-patient privilege - 7.221 [TOP] Puerto Rico Interaction between federal employment discrimination law and Puerto Rico "state" law - 23.041 Puerto Rico as a state for purposes of Eleventh Amendment immunity - 9.321.37 [TOP] Punitive damages See, "Damages" (this index) [TOP]
Pancreatitis (cases addressing particular medical impairments) - 13.251.22
[TOP]
Whether a partner is an employee - 1.400
Individual claims - 5.333
Interaction between federal employment discrimination law and Pennsylvania state law - 23.040
Whether a pension trust fund can be sued - 2.905
Whether Title VII protects a lawful permanent resident working overseas - 1.908.20
Phobia about driving in unfamiliar places (cases addressing particular impairments) - 13.251.24
Person who timely filed charge must file lawsuit - 6.314.20
Policymaking government official exception to Title VII - 1.600
See, United States Postal Service (this index)
Title VII does not preempt a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action - 24.210
Types of circumstantial evidence - 4.741
Unequal treatment, generic prima facie case - 4.533.50
Procreation / Reproduction (disabled with respect to) - 13.225.21
See, "Failure to promote" (this index)
Prostate cancer (cases addressing particular medical impairments) - 13.251.10.10
See, "Retaliation" (this index)
Reverse discrimination prima facie case - 4.541
Psoriasis (cases addressing particular medical impairments) - 13.251.26
Psychotherapist-patient privilege - 7.221
Puerto Rico as a state for purposes of Eleventh Amendment immunity - 9.321.37
See, "Damages" (this index)
© 2010 Garland's Digest